From Novice to Pro: Mastering Lightweight Linux for Your Kubernetes Projects

Linux Journal
1 month 3 weeks ago
by George Whittaker Introduction: Why Lightweight Matters for Kubernetes Devs

When running Kubernetes clusters for development, the operating system’s footprint can make or break performance and agility. Heavy, general-purpose Linux distributions waste memory and CPU cycles on components you’ll never use, while lightweight, container-focused distros keep your nodes lean and optimized. For developers experimenting with k3s, MicroK8s, or full-blown Kubernetes clusters, lightweight Linux offers faster spin-ups, lower overhead, and environments that better simulate production-grade setups.

In this guide, we’ll take a look at the best lightweight Linux options for Kubernetes developers, compare their strengths, and walk through code examples for quick setup. Whether you’re spinning up a local test cluster or building a scalable dev lab, this breakdown will help you pick the right base OS and make the most of your Kubernetes workflow.

Key Considerations for Dev-Focused Kubernetes Nodes

Before diving into individual distros, it’s important to understand what really matters when pairing Linux with Kubernetes:

  • Minimal Resource Usage: A slim OS footprint leaves more CPU and RAM for pods and workloads.

  • Container Runtime Compatibility: Built-in or easy-to-install support for containerd, CRI-O, or Docker ensures smooth cluster bootstrapping.

  • Init System Support: Compatibility with systemd or OpenRC impacts how Kubernetes services are managed.

  • Immutable vs. Mutable: Immutable systems like Fedora CoreOS or Talos enhance reliability but restrict tinkering, while Alpine and Ubuntu Core offer more flexibility for on-the-fly customization.

  • Developer Friendliness: A distro should integrate seamlessly with kubectl, Helm, CI/CD agents, and debugging workflows.

Go to Full Article
George Whittaker

[Testing Updates] 2025-08-26 - Kernels, ZFS, Deepin, Python, Haskell

Manjaro Linux
1 month 3 weeks ago

Hello community, here we have another set of package updates.

Current Promotions Recent News Valkey to replace Redis in the [extra] Repository (click for more details) Previous News Finding information easier about Manjaro (click for more details) Notable Package Updates
  • some Kernels got updated
  • zfs 2.3.4
  • Updates to Deepin
  • Python and Haskell updates
Additional Info Python 3.13 info (click for more details) Info about AUR packages (click for more details)

Get our latest daily developer images now from Github: Plasma, GNOME, XFCE. You can get the latest stable releases of Manjaro from CDN77.

Our current supported kernels
  • linux54 5.4.296
  • linux510 5.10.240
  • linux515 5.15.189
  • linux61 6.1.148
  • linux66 6.6.102
  • linux612 6.12.43
  • linux615 6.15.11 [EOL]
  • linux616 6.16.3
  • linux617 6.17.0-rc3
  • linux61-rt 6.1.146_rt53
  • linux66-rt 6.6.101_rt59
  • linux612-rt 6.12.43_rt12
  • linux615-rt 6.15.0_rt2
  • linux616-rt 6.16.0_rt3

Package Changes (Tue Aug 26 21:23:03 CEST 2025)

  • testing core x86_64: 2 new and 2 removed package(s)
  • testing extra x86_64: 1201 new and 1199 removed package(s)
  • testing multilib x86_64: 6 new and 6 removed package(s)

Overlay Changes

  • testing core x86_64: 4 new and 4 removed package(s)
  • testing extra x86_64: 47 new and 47 removed package(s)

A list of all changes can be found here.

Click to view the poll.

Check if your mirror has already synced:

13 posts - 7 participants

Read full topic

philm

Containers in 2025: Docker vs. Podman for Modern Developers

Linux Journal
1 month 3 weeks ago
by George Whittaker Introduction

Container technology has matured rapidly, but in 2025, two tools still dominate conversations in developer communities: Docker and Podman. Both tools are built on OCI (Open Container Initiative) standards, meaning they can build, run, and manage the same types of images. However, the way they handle processes, security, and orchestration differs dramatically. This article breaks down everything developers need to know, from architectural design to CLI compatibility, performance, and security, with a focus on the latest changes in both ecosystems.

Architecture: Daemon vs. Daemonless Docker's Daemon-Based Model

Docker uses a persistent background service, dockerd, to manage container lifecycles. The CLI communicates with this daemon, which supervises container creation, networking, and resource allocation. While this centralized approach is convenient, it introduces a single point of failure: if the daemon crashes, every running container goes down with it.

Podman’s Daemonless Approach

Podman flips the script. Instead of a single daemon, every container runs as a child process of the CLI command that started it. This design eliminates the need for a root-level service, which is appealing for environments concerned about attack surfaces. Containers continue to run independently even if the CLI session ends, and they can be supervised with systemd for long-term stability.

Developer Workflow and CLI Familiar Command Structure

Podman was designed as a near drop-in replacement for Docker. Commands like podman run, podman ps, and podman build mirror their Docker equivalents, reducing the learning curve. Developers can often alias docker to podman and keep using their existing scripts.

Run an NGINX container

Docker

docker run -d --name web -p 8080:80 nginx:latest

Podman

podman run -d --name web -p 8080:80 nginx:latest GUI Options

For desktop users, Docker Desktop remains polished and feature-rich. However, Podman Desktop has matured significantly. It now supports Windows and macOS with better integration, faster file sharing, and no licensing restrictions, making it appealing for enterprise environments.

Go to Full Article
George Whittaker

The OSPO Book is Now Available in Print!

Linux Foundation
1 month 3 weeks ago

The TODO Group in collaboration with Cloud Native Computing Foundation is thrilled to announce the launch of the physical version of the OSPO Book, a community-driven resource that captures open source management best practices through OSPOs (Open Source Program Offices).

TODO Group

The Data Is In: For COSS Companies, Community Is the Ultimate Moat

Linux Foundation
1 month 3 weeks ago

I’ve spent three decades in technology, watching brilliant founders pour their hearts into building world-changing open source projects. I’ve seen them cultivate vibrant communities, driven by a shared passion for solving hard problems. And I’ve also seen them arrive at a painful crossroads, forced to choose between the community that built them and the capital they need to survive. It’s a story that has ended too often in compromise, with fractured communities and founders left wondering if there was another way.

Matt Trifiro